Volume 5, Issue 4, August 2020, Page: 61-71
Road Asset Management Practices in Ethiopia the Case of Addis Ababa
Yetnayet Bihon Semunigus, Construction Technology and Management, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia; Collage of Engineering and Technology, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia
Received: Apr. 30, 2020;       Accepted: Jun. 17, 2020;       Published: Aug. 10, 2020
DOI: 10.11648/j.jccee.20200504.11      View  134      Downloads  67
Currently, the construction industry is one of the biggest industries in Ethiopia contributing 10% to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). It needs to be emphasized that road construction in Ethiopia is the means through which development are achieved. The economic growth of the country depends on availability and utilization of physical infrastructures. Road construction and utilization in Ethiopia are the means through which development strategies are achieved. The development of road construction projects can be enhanced through well-established Asset Management system that will improve tactical and operational decisions by applying the required knowledge to gain wisdom for provision of strategic infrastructures. However, most of the road construction in Ethiopia encounters problems due to lack of proper Asset Management practices. In this respect, this study’s objective was to investigate Roads Asset Management practices in Ethiopia the case of AACRA. In order to find answers to the research questions and to achieve the objectives of the study, quantitative and qualitative ways of research adapted. Interviews and questionnaires analyzed quantitatively whereas the desk study analyzed qualitatively explanatorily to assess alternatives, diagnose a situation, and discover new ideas. Accordingly, interpretation and discussion were made on the basis of results. The findings of the study revealed that there is lack of: Asset management system components implementation rated as low with a result of 54.5%, 63.6%, 64%, 82% and 73% respectively except condition assessment rated as medium with a result 45.5%, technologies like individual management system implementation in AACRA is in the planning phase as the response of the (7) professional in aggregate revealed, Integration of those management systems also is not there yet. Decision making levels are not explicitly defined in AACRA except programming and budgeting level rated as 54.5%. 91% of respondents revealed that there is lack of professional associations, conferences, short courses and 73% of the respondents disclosed that there is lack of organized asset management department. Some of the specific recommendations forwarded are decision making levels should be explicitly defined, applying different individual management systems and integration of those management systems is necessary and etc. Finally framework were developed for effective and efficient Road Asset Management.
Asset Management, Individual Management Systems, Data Base, Decision Making, Project Selection and AACRA
To cite this article
Yetnayet Bihon Semunigus, Road Asset Management Practices in Ethiopia the Case of Addis Ababa, Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering. Vol. 5, No. 4, 2020, pp. 61-71. doi: 10.11648/j.jccee.20200504.11
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
AASHTO (2001). Pavement Management Guide. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D. C.
Asset Management Policy, Strategy and Plan. Guidelines for Developing an Asset Management Policy, Strategy and Plan. August 2004. State government of Victoria. Department for Victorian communities. 2004. www.dvc.vic.gov/local_gov.htm. Accessed June 05, 2016.
Biniyam Regassa (2015) Msc thesis on Study of Performance Based Road Maintenance Contracting System for Ethiopian Federal Roads, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa.
Dewan, S. A. 2004. Pavement Management and Asset Management Side-by-Side. 6th International Conference on Managing Pavements. Tempe, Arizona, USA.
ERA, assessment of 17 years performance of road sector development program (2014), Addis Ababa.
Federal Negarit Gazette (2014) Federal integrated infrastructure development coordinating agency establishment proclamation, proclamation No. 857/2014, Addis Ababa.
FHWA (1999). “Asset Management Primer”, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Asset Management, Washington, DC.
FHWA (2001) (b). “Data Integration Primer”, Office of Asset Management, Washington, DC.
FHWA (2001) (f). “Data Integration for Asset Management. Forum and Peer Exchange”, Proceedings of the Forum and Peer Exchange, Chicago, IL.
Flintsch G. W., Dymond, R. and Collura, J. (2004). “Pavement Management Applications using Geographic Information Systems”, National Cooperative Highway Research Project 20-5, Synthesis Topic 34-11, Washington, DC.
Gerardo W. Flintsch and J. W. Bryant, Jr. 2006. Asset Management data collection for supporting decision making process.
Haas, R., Hudson, W. R., and J. Zaniewski. Modern Pavement Management. Kreiger Publishing Company, Florida. 1994.
Hudson, W. R., Haas, R., and Uddin, W. (1997). “Infrastructure Management Systems,” McGraw Hill Publishers, New York, NY.
L. Ma, Y. Sun, and J. Mathew (2007) Asset Management Processes: Modeling, Evaluation and Integration, conference of world congress for Engineering Asset Management (WCEAM), Harrogate, UK.
OECD. Asset Management for the Road Sector. OECD Publication, 2001.
PIARC, Asset Management Practice, Technical Committee C4.1 Management of road infrastructure assets, Paris, 2008.
Peregrine Systems Inc. Asset Management product Brief, (2000), "The benefits of Asset Management,” Peregrine systems, the infrastructure management company, Irvine California.
Richard E. Brown and Bruce. G. Humphrey, (2005) Asset Management Transmission and Distribution 2005.
S. Ramakrishna, B. Amol, V. K, Prasanna,(2009) An architecture of a workflow system for integrated Asset Management in the smart oil field domain chevron funded center for interactive smart oil field technologies, university of southern California, Losangeles.
VA. Alexandria, (2002), Research Priorities for successful Asset Management: a workshop Water Environmental Research Foundation London.
Browse journals by subject